diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 8 | 
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
| @@ -53,13 +53,13 @@ Simply adding something into a transparency log is a great start that has merit  on its own.  But, to make the most of a transparency log we should keep the  following factors in mind as the ecosystem bootstraps and develops:  1. Clients should verify that the signed checksums appear in a log.  This -requires inclusion proof verification.  STFE forces this by never issuing -so-called _promises to log_ as in [Certificate +requires inclusion proof verification.  STFE forces inclusion proof verification +by not issuing _promises to log_ as in [Certificate  Transparency](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6962).<sup>[2](#footnote-2)</sup>  2. Clients should verify that the log is append-only.  This requires consistency  proof verification. -3. Clients should verify they see the _same_ append-only log as everyone else. -This requires a well-defined gossip-audit model. +3. Clients should verify that they see the _same_ append-only log as everyone +else.  This requires a well-defined gossip-audit model.  The third point is often overlooked.  While transparency logs are verifiable in  theory due to inclusion and consistency proofs, _it is paramount that the | 
