# System Transparency Front-End (STFE) STFE is a [Trillian](https://transparency.dev/#trillian) [personality](https://github.com/google/trillian/blob/master/docs/Personalities.md) that allows you to log signed checksums. What a checksum represents is up to the submitter. For example, it could be a Firefox update, a Debian package, or a document. You can use STFE to: 1. Discover which signatures were produced by what secret signing keys. 2. Be sure that everyone observes the same signed checksums. **It works as follows.** Suppose that you develop software and publish binaries. You sign those binaries and make them available to users in a database. You are committed to distribute the same non-malicious binaries to every user. That is an easy claim to make. However, word is cheap and sometimes things go wrong. How would you even know if your secret signing key or build environment got compromised? A few select users might receive maliciously signed binaries that include back-doors. This is where STFE can help by adding transparency. For each binary you can log a signed checksum. If a signed checksum appears in the log that you did not expect: excellent, now you know that your secret signing key or build environment was compromised at some point. Anyone can also detect if a logged checksum is unaccounted for in your database by inspecting the log. In other words, the claim that the same non-malicious binaries are published for everyone can be _verified_. ## Design We had several design considerations in mind while developing STFE. A short preview is listed below. Please refer to our [design document](https://github.com/system-transparency/stfe/blob/main/doc/design.md) and [API specification](https://github.com/system-transparency/stfe/blob/main/doc/api.md) for additional details. Feedback is welcomed and encouraged! - **Preserved data flows:** an end-user can enforce transparency logging without making additional outbound connections. The data publisher should distribute proofs of public logging as part of their database. - **Sharding to simplify log life cycles:** starting to operate a log is easier than closing it down in a reliable way. We have a predefined sharding interval that determines the time during which the log will be active. - **Defenses against log spam and poisoning:** to maximize a log's utility it should be open for anyone to use. However, accepting logging requests from anyone at arbitrary rates can lead to abusive usage patterns. We store as little metadata as possible to combat log poisoning. We piggyback on DNS to combat log spam. - **Built-in mechanisms that ensure a globally consistent log:** transparency logs rely on gossip protocols to detect forks. We built a proactive gossip protocol directly into the log. It is based on witness cosigning. - **No cryptographic agility**: the only supported signature scheme is Ed25519. The only supported hash function is SHA256. Not having any cryptographic agility makes the protocol simpler and more secure. - **Few simple (de)serialization parsers:** complex (de)serialization parsers would increase our attack surface and make the system more difficult to use in constrained environments. End-users need a small subset of Trunnel to work with signed and logged data. Log clients additionally need to parse ASCII key-value pairs. ## Public Prototype We have a public prototype that is up and running with zero promises of uptime, stability, etc. You can talk to the log by passing ASCII-encoded key-value pairs. For example, go ahead and fetch the latest tree head: ``` $ curl http://tlog-poc.system-transparency.org:4780/st/v0/get-tree-head-latest timestamp=1623053394 tree_size=1 root_hash=f337c7045b3233a921acc64688b729816a10f95f8be00910418aaa3c71245d5d signature=50e88b935f6010dedb61314685371d16bf180be99bbd3463a0b6934be78c11ebf8cc81688e7d11b0dc593f2ea0453f6be8ed60abb825b5a08535a68cc007e20e key_hash=2c27a6bafcbe210753c64666ca108025c68f28ded8933ebb2c4ef0987d7a6302 ``` We are currently working on tooling that makes it easier to interact with the log.