aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/archive/2021-10-19-paper-planning
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRasmus Dahlberg <rasmus.dahlberg@kau.se>2021-10-02 00:04:16 +0200
committerRasmus Dahlberg <rasmus.dahlberg@kau.se>2021-10-02 00:54:13 +0200
commit16041237842bc729782acb828abd795b6f5935d4 (patch)
tree3852a25b11b53fd23a411b13a82d3c8b81492ce1 /archive/2021-10-19-paper-planning
parentc466d2360c5ab4e042f6c778468b9073017f4bd6 (diff)
updated threat model
- Minor rephrasing and white-space changes to make raw text nicer. - Avoid using sigsum as "signed checksum" in text. Not helpful. - Removed paragraph about risk-averse attacker. It is not needed to make our points right now. In a future revision, we should re-add this and explain why it is interesting. It would also be a good idea to then cite the two papers that z4lem mentioned a while back, see archive. - Clarified that we need a threshold of witnesses that follow the cosigning protocol for security. It is a start on addressing rohonk's comment about which parties may (not) follow protocol and why. - Emphasized that sigsum logging is only more course-grained than CT if the data is actually lost. Hence, more course-grained _in isolation_. - Added links to slow-down and split-view attacks.
Diffstat (limited to 'archive/2021-10-19-paper-planning')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions