From f8d61a93109656e89cbbdeae56ca778127a0eafe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rasmus Dahlberg Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:36:29 +0100 Subject: moved some persisted pads to proposal directory See doc/proposals/2022-01-how-to-use-proposal-folder for details. --- archive/2022-01-04-proposal-tree-head-endpoints | 118 ------------------------ 1 file changed, 118 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 archive/2022-01-04-proposal-tree-head-endpoints (limited to 'archive/2022-01-04-proposal-tree-head-endpoints') diff --git a/archive/2022-01-04-proposal-tree-head-endpoints b/archive/2022-01-04-proposal-tree-head-endpoints deleted file mode 100644 index b2831bf..0000000 --- a/archive/2022-01-04-proposal-tree-head-endpoints +++ /dev/null @@ -1,118 +0,0 @@ -Proposal: change tree-head endpoints - -Background ---- -Right now the get-tree-head-to-sign endpoint returns the signed tree head that -witnesses should cosign. It does not return any cosignatures. One needs to -wait until the to-sign tree head is finalized and served via -get-tree-head-cosigned. We also have a get-tree-head-latest endpoint that is -sort of hanging around for "debug purposes". - -It would be nice if a submitter could find required cosignatures without always -having to wait for five minutes. The log will likely have received a majority -of cosignatures after one minute, but a submitter currently needs to wait the -full duration before getting access via the get-tree-head-cosigned endpoint. - -It would also be nice to consider if the get-tree-head-latest endpoint can be -removed. - -Here is a rough break-down of how we think about the sigsum API's usage via -roles: - * Submitter - * add-leaf, until HTTP status 200 OK which should mean "you have been sequenced". - * [fetching an inclusion proof for a signed tree head to "verify sequencing" - is not a recommended usage pattern, and does not prevent DoS. The only - difference is that the submitter would notice that the log has not - included with regards to the latest tree head sooner than with regards - to the cosigned tree head. In both cases, there is no proof that - submitter got 200 OK without getting sequenced.] - * Distributor - * get-tree-head-cosigned - * get-inclusion-proof - * [wants "enough" cosignatures, sooner rather than later is a soft requirement] - * Monitor - * get-leaves - * get-tree-head-cosigned - * might hit get-{consistency,inclusion}-proof depending on implementation - * [wants as many cosignatures as possible, does not care about ~minutes of waiting] - * Witness - * get-consistency-proof - * get-tree-head-to-sign - * add-cosignature - * [does not / should not care about other cosignatures; just that the - log signed and that the tree head is consistent with prior history as - observed by the witness] - * End-user - * [does not hit any of the log's endpoints] - * "The curious" - * the latest signed tree head, as fast as possible for quick debug - probably. "is the thing I'm doing working". - * the latest cosigned tree head, with as many cosignatures as possible - for archiving - -Keep in mind that the below proposal should not introduce the log's key hash as -output on any API endpoint. We removed this and other redundant output because -that reduces the risk of faulty implementations that operate on untrusted input. - -For example, in the same way that a faulty witness could verify "the wrong -consistency proof" if it just verified the proof against the tree sizes that the -log returned redundantly (as opposed to the tree sizes the witness asked for), a -faulty witness could end-up cosigning a tree head with another log's context -because "they just copied the key hash and used it because it was there". - -Note that we cannot add the key_hash and cosignature fields to the output of -get-tree-head-to-sign. Our ASCII parser is so simple that it does not permit -empty lists. So, we will either need a way to handle empty lists, or tweak our -endpoints so that they still do what we want without having any empty list. - -[Both rgdd and ln5 would like to avoid complicating the ASCII parser.] - -Proposal ---- -1. Remove the get-tree-head-latest endpoint. We no longer have any recommended -usage-pattern for this endpoint and so it should be removed. Our strongest -arguments for removal are "don't use a signed tree head, it is sort of like a -promise", and "it does not even help you prove that the log's HTTP status 200 OK -semantics were faulty". -2. The get-tree-head-to-sign endpoint is kept as is, but renamed. - * Purpose: used by witnesses. -3. Add an endpoint that returns the logs "to-cosign" tree head and all -cosignatures that were collected thus far. If no cosignatures were received -yet, return an error to avoid having an empty list as output. - * Purpose: used by distributors, but could also be used by a witness' - internal monitoring setup ("is my witness working, are the signatures really - showing up?"). -4. Keep an endpoint that serves the "finalized" cosigned tree head. - * Purpose: mainly used by monitors, but could also be used by distributor's - that don't mind the additional waiting or by parties that want to archive - cosigned tree heads. - -This proposal currently does not have a name for the above endpoints. Help -wanted. - -Notes ---- -A witness polls the "get-tree-head-to-sign" endpoint as before. Witnesses are -recommended to poll the log at least once per minute at randomly selected times. - -After a successful add-cosignature request, a witness should not attempt to add -the same cosignature again. A log can refresh their "to-sign tree head" to -instruct witnesses to send their cosignatures again for the same tree size. - -A witness operator may check that their cosignatures appear on the -"get-tree-head-cosigned endpoints". Such checking would likely be part of how -the operator monitors that the witness operates correctly (i.e., it would not be -something that the witness software does itself after a successful -add-cosignature request). - -A submitter ("Signer" in Figure 1) that wants a cosigned tree head that -satisifies a given policy as fast as possible can poll the "dynamic cosigned -tree head endpoint". Keep in mind that polling more than a few times per minute -would not let you obtain cosignatures much faster, see the above recommendation -for how often witnesses should provide their cosignatures. - -A helpful reflection with regards to naming: - * "The log's to-sign STH shows up, it gets filled-up with cosignatures; the - previous cosigned tree head is served on a separate endpoint. Then - "prev=curr, curr=new". I.e., there is a time aspect here that might be - helpful for naming, although previous and current would be bad choices." -- cgit v1.2.3